She’ll draw the gullible in with gobbledygook nonsense and enthral many by randomly throwing in big fancy words, whilst Sarkar sits there like the stupidest sheep in the room utterly taken in by her verbose sophistry!
Strangely some of the trans activists don't like Butler because she doesn't believe in their gendered soul b***ocks but thinks gender identity is 'performative' and, as far as can be made out, her theory of gender performativity argues that gender is created and redefined through repeated actions, such as how we speak, dress, and move.And that, Judith you t**t, amounts to what EDI Jester always calls 'gender identity' namely that it is just 'personality'. But nice of her to collapse a major plank of the TRA argument in on itself🤣
This one update alone, let alone all the others, has enough information to stop any ‘ally’ from thinking that they are the kind and compassionate ones if they’d only listen and step out of their comfortable bubbles for half a second. It’s not just insanity all around us, “It is evil”. That Graham Linehan piece had me in tears and Liz’s endpiece certainly rings true.
Thanks Dusty, stunning pieces and thanks for the ear worms! 😁
Just sent the press office and organisers at Southbank a piece of my mind about this idiocy https://www.southbankcentre.co.uk/whats-on/judith-butler-whos-afraid-of-gender/
Well done, Nicola and thanks for the info. 😊
It is, of course, such as Labour who deserve the description 'reactionary'.
Butler needs to be in the dock when the public inquiry finally arrives!
Dusty
NB Not that anyone will understand what the hell she is talking about!!
She’ll draw the gullible in with gobbledygook nonsense and enthral many by randomly throwing in big fancy words, whilst Sarkar sits there like the stupidest sheep in the room utterly taken in by her verbose sophistry!
I'm sure you will be proved right, Nicola.
Strangely some of the trans activists don't like Butler because she doesn't believe in their gendered soul b***ocks but thinks gender identity is 'performative' and, as far as can be made out, her theory of gender performativity argues that gender is created and redefined through repeated actions, such as how we speak, dress, and move.And that, Judith you t**t, amounts to what EDI Jester always calls 'gender identity' namely that it is just 'personality'. But nice of her to collapse a major plank of the TRA argument in on itself🤣
Dusty
She is like a (supposed) feminist who likes stereotypes !!
Ash Sarkar and Butler. What a nightmare. I’d love a peak at the audience 😆 Well done for complaining, think I’ll join you.
Indeed! Sarkar all sycophantic and an audience of gushing gullibles. Pass me the sick bag! Good on you for giving them what for too!
This one update alone, let alone all the others, has enough information to stop any ‘ally’ from thinking that they are the kind and compassionate ones if they’d only listen and step out of their comfortable bubbles for half a second. It’s not just insanity all around us, “It is evil”. That Graham Linehan piece had me in tears and Liz’s endpiece certainly rings true.
Thanks Dusty, stunning pieces and thanks for the ear worms! 😁
You're welcome, TT.
Powerful piece from Glinner and great piece from Liz.
It was Cheltenham Ladies College that I couldn't get out of my head - 'played a good hand of poker'😂 Those were the days!
Dusty
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wp6qNhaKA1E
We know about this case but I thought it was a perfect match.
#GenderIdeologyIsEvil
Thanks for this, TT