Kes
Update 785. What Is A Woman Special. #BeMorePorcupine.
The news and views are continuing to pour in to Dusty Towers, so another long one ,dear readers, but emphasis on the puberty blocker trial and the US Supreme Court cases. And Wizards. Wizards?
Prior to Update 800 please submit your favourite detective film (one choice each). The submissions will all go in a hat and then I will pick out one submission.The winner will get a free paid subscription or, if s/he is already a paid subscriber, they can nominate someone to get a free paid subscription. Get your thinking caps on!! Thanks to those who have already sent in their choice.
After our Christmas film series, we are back to the Dusty, Nicola and Moodie Film Series. Please keep the suggestions for films coming in but please check the list first which I am updating as we go along. Please send suggestions in the comments here at this link:
Kes is a 1969 British film directed by Ken Loach and based on the 1968 novel A Kestrel For A Knave, written by Barry Hines. It follows the story of Billy, who comes from a dysfunctional working class Yorkshire family and is a no-hoper at school, but discovers his own private means of fulfilment when he adopts a fledgling kestrel and proceeds to train it in the art of falconry.
David Bradley, in his first acting role, is Billy.
Thanks to three wonderful readers for suggested pieces.
Some of the linked pieces below may be behind a paywall.
Stop The Puberty Blocker Trial
I reported on the day from the Stop The Trial demo outside the Department of Health:
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/block-the-blockers
You Tuber Stephen Knight was also there. Probably most of you have listened to the speeches but if you haven’t or if you want to listen again here they are. There is a brief interview with Helen Joyce before the speeches ( during which I came up and said ‘hello’ very loudly to the Sex Matters crew and was told to shhh by Fiona McAnena because Helen was being interviewed 😂) and a short bit at the end when the MPs and Baroness Fox get led around the houses by the police to get in the entrance to the Department to deliver a letter to the Health Secretary because of all the trans rights and pro Palestine protestors who were outside. If you do listen to the speeches, I occasionally appear in the background in a black overcoat, suffragette scarf and black woolly hat. I am often dabbing my eyes with a tissue or blowing my nose since I suffer from blepharitis ( an eye condition that make my eyes continually water and get very itchy) and have suffered from sinus problems for as long as I can remember. Apart from that ( and eczema, asthma and sciatica), I am right as rain 😀 Once upon a time I was a super fit dustman at a time when you had to pick up the heavy bins (hence my nickname). Sigh! At one stage I am stood further back talking to a lady in a red hat who had just wandered by and wanted to know what was going on. I explained it to her and she kept expressing amazement. I think I may have peaked her 😇
Excellent discussion on Women’s Rights Network weekly podcast with Louise Irvine, co-chair of the Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender (CAN-SG) and Terry Patterson from Thoughtful Therapists.
The States - The Supreme Court
Two cases about men in women’s sport came before the US Supreme Court yesterday ( this is a bit like their For Women Scotland moment) and Sex Matters provide a great explanation of the cases. Obviously it will be a while before the result is know. Fingers crossed!
“What is a woman?”: the US Supreme Court must decide
Jan 13, 2026
On 13th January 2026, the United States Supreme Court will hear two cases which push it to adjudicate on what “sex” means in US equality law. Two states, Idaho and West Virginia, are defending their state laws to restrict female athletics to those born female.
These cases are, in effect, a US version of the For Women Scotland case, which established in UK equality law that sex always has its normal biological meaning. Sex Matters provided “Amicus Curiae” briefs to support the two states in the US cases in the public interest. (“Amicus Curiae”, meaning “friend of the court”, is similar to being an intervenor in the UK.) Our acting chair, Dr Emma HIlton, is part of a separate intervention by a group of academics.
» Read brief of Sex Matters on our website »
» Read brief of Emma Hilton PhD et al on our website »
The USA has no single law like Britain’s Equality Act. But it does have “Title IX”, which is part of its 1972 Education Amendments. This prohibits discrimination based on sex in education programmes and activities that receive federal financial assistance. It covers admissions, athletics, employment and student conduct, and has been influential in moving towards equal provision of facilities, funding and scholarships for girls and boys in high-school and college sports.
Title IX states:
“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
The legal issue for the court is what “on the basis of sex” means. If it means biology, as in the UK, then allowing trans-identifying boys or men into programmes or scholarships for women or girls violates Title IX since in effect it subjects women and girls to discrimination if there is no female category and they lose out on medals, scholarships and team places to boys. If, instead, a boy can count as a “transgender girl”, then schools and colleges can treat them as female without facing a discrimination challenge under Title IX.
Battles between state and federal law
Over the past few years, many US states have passed laws prohibiting school and college sport from allowing trans-identifying boys or men into female categories. Others have insisted that these “transgender girls” are girls. The divide is predictably partisan: Republican state legislatures have protected the female category; most Democrat-led states have not, and in a few cases a Democrat governor has blocked state legislation.
There have been legal challenges in both directions. Female students have brought cases against states such as Connecticut that allowed boys to claim high-school girls’ state championships; and against sports bodies, such as the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA), which allowed Lia Thomas to swim in women’s national competitions. The Connecticut case is currently at the Court of Appeal, the last stage before the Supreme Court. A challenge in Minnesota, where a trans-identifying boy was part of a girls’ high-school team that won a state softball championship, has also reached Appeal level.
Meanwhile, trans-identifying students and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [ Dusty - more like the Larping Men’s Union] have challenged state laws that protect the female category and do not grant them access to the sports matching their claimed identity. Two of these cases have now reached the Supreme Court.
The cases in the Supreme Court this week
Two states, Idaho and West Virginia, are defending their state laws to restrict female athletics to those born female. The cases are The Governor of Idaho et al v Lindsay Hecox et al and West Virginia et al v BPJ.
The cases are being heard together because they are on the same point of law. Idaho was the first state to take action explicitly to protect female sport, with its Fairness in Women’s Sport law, passed in March 2020. A trans-identifying male, Lindsay Hecox, won an injunction against that law, the state appealed, and now the case has reached the highest level, the Supreme Court.
West Virginia followed Idaho with its own law a year later. That was challenged by BPJ, a trans-identifying young man whose puberty was blocked and who wanted access to girls’ high-school sport. Although the case was brought by the trans-identifying boy, the evidence now includes accusations that BPJ sexually harassed girls in his high school including in the girls’ changing room.
Both trans claimants have been assisted by the ACLU, which claims that these laws violate the equal-protection clause of the US Constitution. It says transgender people must be treated as the sex in which they identify, and the state laws need to be struck down.
What’s at stake?
There are now 27 states with similar laws protecting sport for women and girls. If these two cases are lost, then no state will be permitted to adopt such a law. All would have to adopt policies like those of California and Connecticut, which actively support “transgender girls” in female sport.
If the Supreme Court rules for the states in these defensive cases, it would mean that sex-based laws are permitted but not obligatory. California and other states would not be forced to adopt them.
If the cases being brought by female claimants against states such as Connecticut which require “trans inclusion” also reach the Supreme Court, they could determine that states must protect the female category on the basis of sex.
It is not just about sport. A declaration that sex in Title IX means biology would clarify the meaning of sex-discrimination protections across all federally funded education programmes. Like the For Women Scotland judgment in the UK Supreme Court, it would provide a strong indication that sex can only mean sex, anywhere it appears in law.
Signs that US media coverage is shifting towards reality
The Washington Post, a liberal paper that has long been sympathetic to “trans girls”, says in this editorial, published the day before the hearing, that neither science nor the American public is on the side of the trans athletes. It says:
“The Supreme Court has the chance this week to save women’s sports, allowing states to restore a level playing field for girls by excluding biological men and thereby correcting one of the worst excesses of America’s cultural revolution.”
Such a strong and unequivocal statement from a traditionally Democrat-leaning journal shows recognition that popular opinion on this issue is not with the trans-affirming Democrats.
Other articles, such as this backgrounder from sports outlet ESPN, continue to centre the demands of “transgender girls” as if they are rights.
Which way will it go?
The conservative majority in the US Supreme Court makes it likely that reality will prevail. In a sign that the trans claimants may feel this too, Lindsay Hecox asked the court not to hear the Idaho case, on the basis that he is no longer participating in sports in Idaho. The state governor requested that it be heard nonetheless, since he wants to establish that the Fairness in Women’s Sport statute is lawful.
Oral arguments will be heard this week. Judgment will be handed down in the coming months, with no further indication of likely timing.
Gerald Posner on the site Just The Facts was there and reports back:
When the Supreme Court Has to Ask What Sex Means
A three-hour Title IX argument revealed how far the law — and the culture — have drifted from biological reality.
Jan 14, 2026
……………………………….
What the Court Was Really Wrestling With
Several of the conservative justices returned to a basic point that has been oddly difficult to say out loud: federal law has always allowed separate teams for males and females to ensure fair competition. Why should the Court now impose a single national rule when states remain divided — and when the science itself resists abstraction?
That reframes the dispute. This is not about hostility toward transgender people. It is about whether courts should override biological reality in contexts where physical differences determine outcomes.
The justices also pressed on a question that increasingly has no answer in public discourse: what does sex mean in law? When sex becomes an open-ended concept untethered from biology, legal lines stop holding. At that point, it is not just women’s sports at risk, but sex-based protections across the legal system.
What Is at Stake
Outside the Court, protesters chanted slogans about ideology and biology. Inside, the language was more measured — but the conflict was the same.
Female athletes are watching closely. Many of them quietly. Some of them angrily. They understand what is on the line: scholarships, records, safety, and competitive integrity. These are not abstractions. They are the product of decades of progress under a law that worked precisely because it was grounded in reality.
The Court has touched this terrain before, in other contexts. But sports are different. Unlike bathrooms or pronouns, athletic competition produces winners and losers. Biology is not symbolic here. It is decisive.
A Hope — Not a Prediction
I have learned never to predict Supreme Court outcomes, especially in cases this charged. But I will say this: the most radical decision the Court could make right now would also be the most restrained.
To reaffirm that sex is a real and material category in law.
To recognize that Title IX’s success depends on that recognition.
And to state plainly that preserving women’s sports is not discrimination — it is the reason they exist.
One day, future generations may look back and ask how the Supreme Court ever had to debate whether sex is real.
My hope is that they will also see this moment as the beginning of a course correction.
Not because it was political.
But because truth still mattered.
The full piece is here:
https://www.justthefacts.media/p/when-the-supreme-court-has-to-ask
The Informed Dissent podcast from LGB Courage Coalition in their two part podcast discuss, amongst many other things, the Supreme Court case. Great States side update, good discussion and great interview with Ben Appel. Haven’t heard of his book ( Cis White Gay) so added it to my (long) list. They praise Dr Martens as the great unisex shoes!
Sorry to bring bad news to them but Dr Martens are off with the woo!! See my report (Shocked) here:
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/mrs-lopsided?utm_source=publication-search
Dr Martens were originally made by a company called Solovair in Northampton, England but were sold off in 2014 and are now mainly manufactured in Asia. When I made the above report I switched to Solovair shoes which are very similar to Dr Martens. And no I am not paid by Solovair ( I wish!)
Here are my latest pair of Solovairs ( just to show their similarity to DM shoes…oh, and some book or other):
England - The Hippodrome
We discussed the two larping men in the ladies at the Hippodrome Casino in London here:
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/the-jungle-book-theres-teeth-in-the
I didn’t realise that the NAG Awards was the awards ceremony organised by Not All Gays!! Duhhh! Helen Joyce on her substack deals with the drama:
Harridans at the Hippodrome
How women standing up for women’s spaces look to the other side
Jan 13, 2026
In the absence of any lead from government or regulators, individual venues are having to decide how to handle clashes between men who believe — with plenty of evidence — that they will be allowed to use women’s spaces, and women who know that the logical implication of last year’s Supreme Court ruling is that spaces designated as women’s must be solely for women.
A vivid example was provided last Friday when a young woman went into the toilet at the Hippodrome casino in central London and saw two cross-dressing men inside. She left, asked a security guard to remove them and were told that they had the right to use the toilets because they were “dressed as women”. So she gathered some friends and they returned and challenged the men themselves.
Much of the altercation was videoed; security turned up and in the end the men left voluntarily. There’s a writeup in the Daily Mail, and one of the women involved talked about it to GB News. (As it happens, I was at the same event as the young women (the Hippodrome lets out private rooms), but I had left before it all kicked off. )
I’ve spent some time in the past couple of days looking at hostile responses on social media. Most posters sympathise with them and think they did a great job of standing up for themselves — as do I. But I always wonder how these things come across to people who either disagree with my position or aren’t sure what to think.
The full piece is here:
https://www.thehelenjoyce.com/p/harridans-at-the-hippodrome
I am often reporting about larping men in women’s toilets and changing rooms etc. Normally it is the woman who complains who either gets banned herself ( such as the LB Southwark case recently) or gets nowhere and told that nothing can be done ( such as the recent incident with a larping man masturbating in a women’s restroom in California). So what stood out about this case ( albeit it seems security were a bit confused as to what to do) is that the larping and clearly ( surprise, surprise) aggressive men were escorted out. And, of course, the woman who first complained needed other women to support her ( perfectly understandable). So well done those women.
And, yes, there were gender neutral toilets on every floor so clearly these men were out for some kind of fetishistic validation plus it is not for women to sort out their problem.
And who else was there????? Why, Mr Menno!! Who received two awards. Congratulations, Menno, and he also addresses the Ladies incident. All thoughts gratefully received.
The Council Of Europe
The Council of Europe (CoE) is a distinct pan-European organisation, separate from the European Union, founded in 1949 to promote human rights, democracy, and the rule of law across its 46 member states, operating from Strasbourg with key institutions like the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that enforces the European Convention on Human Rights. It creates common legal standards.
The Council of Europe cannot force member states to carry out those ‘legal standards’ but the current UK Government are committed to bringing in a conversion practices bill, so the current proposals (to be voted on on 29 January) from the Council of Europe as reported by Athena Forum are very worrying:
In December 2025, the Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination of the PACE unanimously adopted a draft resolution calling for a Europe-wide ban on “conversion practices” — aimed at changing, repressing or suppressing a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.
The resolution was tabled by Kate Osborne, a UK Labour MP and member of the Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group.
The framing of the resolution intentionally conflates sexual orientation with gender identity and gender expression. They are completely different, and arguably incompatible, concepts. Gender identity and gender expression are highly contested ideological beliefs that deny biological reality and claim that children can be born in the wrong body.
The resolution calls for criminal sanctions, national legislation, monitoring mechanisms and coordination with civil society organisations to enforce this framework — effectively criminalising mental‑health professionals, educators, parents and social workers who do not affirm a child’s self-declared trans identity.
It proposes mandatory training and public awareness campaigns across a wide range of institutions — including healthcare services, social work, education, religious institutions, law enforcement, the judiciary and prosecutors — embedding this belief system into state-funded services, professional standards and school curricula.
Read our comprehensive briefing on the transactivist push to extend “conversion therapy” bans to gender identity and gender expression here. This ideological overreach must be removed.
Ahead of the vote on 29 January 2026, MPs in the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) need to hear from you.
How to write
Be polite, factual and reasoned.
Use your own words. Tell them why this matters to you — as a parent, teacher, social worker, health professional, public servant, researcher, student, employee or citizen.
You can use our template below as a starting point. You may edit it and add your own thoughts to make it stronger.
Who to write to
You can write to the head of your national delegation to PACE, using our form below.
You can write to the chair of a political group within PACE, addressing members across national delegations, using our form below.
You can write directly to individual members of PACE, focusing on those most relevant to your concern. Their contact details are available via their national parliament websites, as all members are delegated national MPs.https://athena-forum.eu/take-action/your-voice-matters-write-to-your-pace-delegate/
The full piece is here:
https://athena-forum.eu/take-action/your-voice-matters-write-to-your-pace-delegate/
Canada - Living In A Captured Community
It is difficult to get new from Tranada …sorry, Canada, so I was pleased to get this report from Sex Reality Bites:
Jan 03, 2026
Here is an excerpt:
My Fave Substack Notes of 2025
1. Word Art - “I Used to Believe Trans Rights are Human Rights Meant Protecting Everyone’s Rights”
I was inspired to use the words (in the above poster) from a post by a user on X called @FLUMMOXXED that was being shared far and wide by sex realist women. I recreated them prompting vintage florals and lettering style honouring Suffragette banners using ChatGPT and Photoshop
I used to believe that trans activism — and the slogan “trans rights are human rights” — meant protecting everyone’s rights. That it stood for dignity, inclusion, and safety for all. I thought it meant ensuring trans-identified people weren’t left out of important conversations, especially around their safety.
But then I started learning what it actually meant in practice:
That “trans rights” means including males in the category of female — in all circumstances. And with that came the fallout:
Categories that were once sex-specific became mixed.
My little children and I lost access to the only female washroom in my small community.
Our mothers’ group could only get funding if it rebranded as a gender-neutral “parent” group — open to men too.
Breastfeeding groups began supporting men lactating to affirm a gender identity.
Single sex groups and spaces weren’t allowed anymore, anywhere for any purpose. People didn’t realize that sex-separated groups were quietly changing over to being separated by gender identity via mandated “updated diversity and inclusion policies.”
Then I started seeing how it affected gender non conforming children.
Little (future) gay and lesbian kids — their temperaments and preferences — were being pathologized as signs they were “born in the wrong body.” And the solution? Not just sterilizing them, but turning them into lifelong medical patients. Turning them into a “straight” simulacra of the opposite sex. Without any good quality research for it.
In day to day life, I saw how “trans rights” also meant that:
Women and men couldn’t request same-sex caregivers or midwives.
I had to pretend not only that sex didn’t matter to me— but that it didn’t matter to anyone.
Rape victims couldn’t request females for aftercare or support and even had to refer to their male rapists as “she” on the stand.
Parents or caregivers for non-verbal autistic and mentally challenged female loved ones couldn’t request support workers who are also female.
I was expected to believe that clothes and hairstyles communicated more about someone than their actual body.
Children’s single-sex sleep away and day camps, sports and groups (such as Girl Guides or Girls Science Camps) started to include kids of the opposite sex participating as stealth and nobody was allowed to say anything— worse, could be punished for noticing sex, all without consent from other participants or parents.
And above all, I realized that trans rights means:
What someone says they are is more important than what they are. To declare that trans women are women means erasing the category of woman altogether.
And I can’t do that.
Sex matters.
And it always will — in far too many ways to count.
2. Single Panel Digital Web Comic - “Absurd.”
I created this image to capture how the birth of a child is increasingly filtered through the language of gender identity ideology in birthing and hospital settings— the name tags are exaggerated, the policies aren’t. In my post I write “pronouns might as well be mandated name tags” and that’s what was inspiration for this comic. The speech bubbles are there to show how terms like “assigned sex at birth” and ideologically-driven gender-neutral welcomes distort to absurdity what should be a simple, human moment.
Absurd.
It is only men who can impregnate a woman. It is only women who have carried every single human being in their bodies — and fed them from their breasts.
Everyone on the planet has a belly button. That is where they were connected to their mother’s womb. Only women have wombs.
A baby’s sex is known before it is even born — sometimes from a single draw of blood. Then again on the ultrasound. And once more at birth, when the truth is unmistakable.
To look down at your newborn child and see whether it’s a boy or a girl — that is not learned. It is primal. It is instinct. How ridiculous to ask how a mother identifies. It is known by the mere fact she brought life into the world.
How delusional is it to believe anyone chooses who they are — the physical matter, the flesh and blood, the raw materials.
You can only choose how to make your body look — the way a sculptor shapes stone with a chisel. But art doesn’t get to demand anything of the eye that beholds it. And it certainly doesn’t get to punish the critics.
These pronouns aren’t progress. They are a parody of reality. Pronouns might as well be mandated name tags — stickers scribbled across a stranger’s chest, with your forced acceptance parading through the most sacred moments of human life. Moments when who everyone is couldn’t be more clear.
It feels like a joke. And yet we’re expected to play along — always. As if any of this makes sense.
Absurd.
The full piece is here:
https://substack.com/inbox/post/183284852?triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Trans Widows
Excellent interview with Tracy Shannon by Kelly Dougall.
Tracy says that so called ‘trans rights’ are a threat to women’s freedom. Her former husband would copy her mannerisms. Then she discovered he had been cross dressing. They went to a counsellor who asked Tracy if she was now a lesbian!!! Her former husband kept saying he would stop cross dressing but then she would catch him again. They had three children. Eventually she sought a divorce. To start with he got joint custody (!) though eventually she got sole custody.
Wizard Rights!!
Great analogy by a parent on the substack, Parents With Inconvenient Truths about Trans:
The Rise of Wizard Rights
Jan 14, 2026
There have always been con men peddling snake oil, and the usual gullible suspects are ready and willing to take up a new preposterous cause. In the year 2035, after the gender clinics have been closed, what will be next?
“We must stop targeting vulnerable young wizards.” So says one of the speakers at a first-of-its-kind Wizard Convention. In this convention, politicians, doctors, online influencers, and wizard activists have expressed unconditional support for “wizard rights”, the rights of self-declared wizards to be respected and acknowledged for who they are.
The number of self-declared wizards has surged in recent years. Years ago, there were only a handful of wizards - mostly middle-aged men who discovered late in life that they were not “mundanes” (the wizard name for non-wizards), they were wizards! Now kids as young as four years old are surprising their parents with the statement, “Mom, Dad - I’m a wizard!” New subreddit groups are starting every day!
How do these kids know they are wizards? It’s an inner feeling of self, and if a child feels it, the only treatment is to start “wizard affirmation care” or “WAC”, prescribed by wizard doctors. Wizard clinics are opening everywhere! The care starts with a daily cocktail of legal drugs that are used in an off-label way: It’s typically a special mix of LSD, anabolic steroids, thalidomide, and fentanyl, all used to enhance wizard capabilities. Surgical modifications include lopping off body parts and reshaping them into humps, tails, fangs, beards, wings, and just about anything a wizard can think of. Most wizard doctors are former gender doctors, so they are ready and eager to experiment on healthy bodies, never mind the harm. Wizards are very secretive about their magic, and will not demonstrate it to non-believers, but find their magic is very helpful in sports.
Some skeptics are concerned that this new “wizard industry” is too similar to the old “gender industry”, where kids as young as five years old would claim they were “born in the wrong body”, and gender doctors would give them drugs and perform surgeries so these kids could “live their authentic life”. With no biological basis for such claims and no evidence of improved mental health, the gender industry fell apart under a wave of lawsuits followed by criminal trials where hundreds of doctors were charged with gross negligence, making death threats against children, and advocating suicide, though many doctors escaped jail-time claiming they were just following AMA-approved “standards of care”. The “following standards of care” defense does sound reminiscent of the “just following orders” defense of another era. In any case, the gender clinics were abandoned and closed.
The full piece is here:
Terf Island Discs
Thanks to all readers ( and me 😀) who have made suggestions and we still have lots of songs to go that will take us well into 2026. It’s been great (I think anyway 😊).
We will then be reverting to Endpieces.
Endpieces, as regular readers will know, consisted of comic pieces, animal videos, songs etc to provide a bit of relief after some of the horror stories we detail on this substack. Endpieces was run by Tenaciously Terfin, Liz Parker and myself and we are delighted to now have been joined by Becca Shambles, Petal and Jeremy Wickins. Please let us know if you want to join the Endpieces Club 😊
I have an Endpieces folder so Endpieces suggestions can be sent to me at any time from now even though Terf Island Discs will be continuing for the moment as explained above 😊
Onwards with Terf Island Discs.
Given that we are featuring today the crucial US Supreme Court cases, I thought I would intervene with some music from the States. So here are The Banditos with ‘Old Ways’:
#BeMorePorcupine
#KeepTerfing
#StandWithSandiePeggie
#PubertyIsAHumanRight
#AdultHumanFemale
#LetWomenSpeak
#LGB✂️TQ
#StopLyingLabour
#HoldTheLine
#BeMoreMowgli
#NeverSurrender
#NeverForget
#TruthWillTriumph
#WeWillWin
Thanks Dusty, great work as ever. Congratulations Mr. Menno, some well deserved recognition. The Pitt piece on Wizards is very clever and very apt. It really shows up the nonsense for what it is. And🤞for the US Supreme Court decision although it’s going to take some months apparently.
Your shoes are beautifully polished Dusty, you show me up. I remember that piece on the Doc Martens. I notice that I made an extremely erudite comment at the time. 😁
#BanBlockers #NoTrial
As wings roving ( maybe spelt with an a )reporter here’s the latest , it’s a long one !
https://wingsoverscotland.com/learning-insanity/