A Spoonful Of Sugar
Update 474. What Is Our Goal Special. #BeMorePorcupine
This is a long one, dear readers.
Next in the British Heroes season ( and sticking with children’s films) we have the 1964 Disney classic ( back in the day when Disney actually made good films), Mary Poppins. The film, which combines live-action and animation, stars Julie Andrews in her feature film debut as Mary Poppins, the nanny who works for a dysfunctional family in London and employs her unique brand of ‘working’ to improve the family's dynamic. It also features Dick Van Dyke’s hilarious attempt at a Cockney accent.
Thanks as ever to two wonderful readers for suggested pieces.
The Irish General Election
The General Election is taking place on 29 November. I hope to do an analysis of the parties in due course with regard to gender ideology and free speech but, in the meantime, here is Dr Matt Treacy on Gript News providing a depressing assessment of the campaign so far. Come on, the people of Ireland, rise up!!
A banal election so far marked by stifling consensus around key issues
November 14
Perhaps it was the predictability of the date and the fact that all sides had thrown most of their best shots and dirt before the whistle was blown, but this election to me reeks of utter banality.
Certainly, by way of contrast to the recent American elections, the electoral contest between the main parties is almost completely devoid of substance. The reason why this is so is that the three biggest parties – Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin – are contesting a narrow ground. It is an election mostly about numbers: houses, nurses, Guards, marginal tax rates and mind numbingly on. I shall return to this.
There was a cliché – largely accurate – that over much of the past 60 or 70 years almost nothing separated the American Republicans and the Democrats. Much of what divided them was related to regional and social, cultural and ethnic differences but even that has shifted somewhat with the Democrats having almost completely lost their southern white plebeian support who have gone largely to the Republicans, but have consolidated their hold on the black urban vote.
Economically, neither Trump nor Harris – no more than Simon and Mary Lou – was offering radically different policies, but there was a clear, or at least a clearly perceived, existential choice. Whatever the theatrics and the sincerity of the actors involved there is no doubt but that tens of millions of people cast their votes on November 5 on the basis of what sort of America they wish to see or wish to preserve. Trump stands for one. Harris for a radically different place.
There is no such thing at stake in our own hustings. The last time there was, back 40 years and more, was when the Shakespearian dark lord Charlie faced off with Garret the Good and his anaemic allies in the Labour Party. Fianna Fáil even had a rousing ballad calling on people “from northern hills to Leinster’s doors” to hark to the “ancient cry of freedom” and to “rise and follow Charlie.”
Can you even imagine Micheál Martin having the cojones to attempt to carry that one off? “Rise and follow Mikey.” Where to? A workshop on diversity and integration? Or on how to roll a spliff once he “frees the weed.” Instead, they’ve opted for “Moving Forward Quietly” or something nice and inoffensive on those lines.
And the Blueshirts? What happened to the days when they were promising to kick lads, including the weak-kneed Irregular President, up the feckin’ transom and calling him a bollix for not opening up the possibility of returning to the glory days of the Winter of 1922 when they just shot people instead of “hearing their concerns” and promising to take them on board.
Labour have never been much good at that sort of thing. It wasn’t for no reason that Fianna Fáil’s Seán Lemass once described their leadership as a “harmless bunch of men” when someone was implying that they were Communists.
Now, they just pretend that they were once revolutionary leftists and that they spent the bitter persecuted years of Deeply Conservative Ireland hiding in the back lounges of south Dublin pubs reading dirty bukes that The Bishops would have a lad tied to a lamppost on the Vico Road for possession of and have his backside slapped with a hurl by a crazed revanchist nationalist Chirstian Brother. And worse maybe, if they’d seen Deliverance.
The Labour Party, like the Monty Python parrot, has ceased to exist in my neck of the woods thankfully so I don’t actually know off the top of my head what their slogan is and I have no intention of putting myself to the bother of finding out. Probably something to do with fairness and being nice would be a ballpark guess.
What about the Shinners? For a time they were completely gone over to Change. Then they seemed to have copped on that this was boring the heads of people rather than inspiring them, but they have reverted to default. “Vote for Change” is the cry around the hillsides.
When I were a lad and knocking doors for the Shinners in 1987 we had a thumping great election slogan: “Don’t Get Angry, Get Even.” (Borrowed from the Neapolitan Camorra or Brooklyn Mafia I seem to recall.) It promised to do just what it said on the box. Now it’s all “Oh let’s be nice to everyone. Change.” Enough already. “Revenge by Jaysus.” Put that on the canvass cards.
In a similar ecumenical spirit if I was to be advising People Before Profit I would say that they ought to person up and stake out a separate claim to the rest of the liberal and eco left. Their solution to the housing crisis is partly to take houses that are already there from the people who already own them and give them to someone else, including people who have gone to the trouble of travelling long distances for that opportunity.
So spell it out like mensch, or menschen. Something like a menacing photo of one of Trotsky’s leather clad enforcers of equality and eco fairness from 1920 over the slogan “We Don’t Care How Long the House Has Been in Your Family …..” Just a suggestion.
On a more serious note, there is of course the argument that it is a good thing that none of the likely main components of any government in a democracy is going to do something completely radical and different. Stability depends on them all sticking to the programme. And in the Irish state that means being in the EU Commission’s good books, accepting the dominance of overseas corporations and adhering to a liberal agenda on issues such as immigration, abortion, genderism and so on.
Sinn Féin fundamentally do not differ from the consensus even on what used to be known as the “national question.” Partition is grand once the Taigs are wetting their beaks and helping in running the place. The only difference is the Shinner insistence on an unlikely and unwinnable border poll at some point in the 2040s and that is like 27th on anyone’s reasons why they will pick a party down here.
Left and Right are meaningless really when related to the economic policies of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin as none of them differ on their view of Ireland’s place in the international corporate economy and all accept the need for a high degree of welfarism to maintain social stability. The left will promise higher levels of welfare payments but that has been by and large neutralised as an issue in this election by the recent budget.
Some do counter the acceptance of that consensus by suggesting that there are large existential issues that need addressing and that none of the main parties, nor the smaller ones likely to be asked if needed to make up the numbers, are going there. They are all comfortable in the space framed by that consensus.
Gript has been one of the few to highlight the need for a debate across the entire consensus from abortion to immigration and the profound impact all of this is having and will continue to have on the shape of Irish society. The alternative to the consensus is before the electorate but it is one that is presently mostly confined to the margins.
Perhaps that may change and that it will be reflected in the sort of electoral shifts that were manifested or hinted at to some degree in the local and European elections last June. There is little evidence to date in the campaign, however, that this will be significant.
Free Speech
Following on from the reports about Allison Pearson’s case in the last update, we continue in like vein.
Sarah Phillimore, barrister and member of Fair Cop, is taking a case against the College of Policing and Wiltshire Police as she reports in The Critic. This is an extremely important challenge. Go, Sarah!
The British Twitter Stasi
Police forces should not be secretly recording my tweets as ‘hate incidents’
14 November, 2024
When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 it took with it the East German State security force known as the ‘Stasi’. At the time of its demise, the Stasi employed 91,015 people and relied on 173,081 informants. This works out as one secret police officer for every 166 East Germans, making the Gestapo look like lazy amateurs with their trifling one per 2,000. The Stasi were dangerous because of their embrace of ‘Zersetzung’ (‘decomposition’ or ‘biodegradation’). The aim of ‘Zersetzung’ was to destroy the psychological integrity of an individual, by gathering information to damage their reputation and their personal relationships.
As German historian Huberts Knabe commented in 2014:
‘The Stasi didn’t try to arrest every dissident, it preferred to paralyse them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and so many informants’
Given that all this occurred within memory of most people reading this (I was 19 years old when the Wall fell) I find it both depressing and frankly terrifying that many seem to have forgotten the lesson already – or worse, they do not care.
In October 2020 the College of Policing replaced the existing Hate Crimes Operational Guidance with Authorised Professional Practice Guidance on Hate Crime (“APPGHC”), apparently in response to the serious criticism of Mr Justice Knowles in Miller v College of Policing about how the original guidance had been implemented by Humberside Police.
But its bones remain; ‘hate’ retains a very wide definition to include ‘dislike’ or ‘unfriendliness’ and recording of ‘hate’ incidents is entirely at the behest of the alleged victim, who may not be questioned as to their motives or rationality. The police continue to claim they are building a vital database of intelligence to inform their operational priorities and allocation of scarce resources. They claim it is vitally important to keep an eye on those of us likely to ‘escalate’ into criminality. I believe however it is much more likely that they risk being led by the nose by the hysterical or the actively malicious, and that the information they are gathering is worse than useless.[ Dusty - hear, hear!].
South Yorkshire Police recorded me for religious hate for commenting that my cat might be a Methodist
None of us are any safer for all this. On the contrary, there must be a serious risk that many of the 120,000+ people whose ‘hate incidents’ have been recorded since the first HCOG was introduced in 2015 are very much less safe. They have been recorded secretly as ‘hateful’ on a false and irrational basis, their alleged misdemeanours retained on a police database with obvious implications for employment prospects when these incidents are revealed on a DBS [ Disclosure and Barring Service] check.
I can comment with some authority on the likely impact of this policy because at least two of those 120,000 incidents will have my name attached. In July 2020 I wrote to Wiltshire police requesting they reveal to me what ‘hate incidents’ were recorded against me. They obliged. A ‘hate incident’ had been recorded against my name in February 2020 for ‘hate’ against religious and transgender people. The police report was stark; ‘a barrister who has been publishing hate…’
I was never told. I was given no opportunity to challenge or defend myself. The 12 pages of tweets contained much repetition and went back as far as October 2017 – someone had clearly been assiduous in their harvesting of my ‘hate’. I assert and will continue to assert that no one in their right mind could reasonably categorise anything I published as ‘hate’ against anyone or anything. Twitter has never asked me to delete any of the publications as contrary to their terms of service which forbids hateful content. Anyone who has followed the gender debate online knows that Twitter has a ridiculously low bar for what they consider hateful; yet the tweets remain on my timeline. Go read and judge my ‘hate’ for yourself.
South Yorkshire Police have also recorded me for religious hate for commenting that my cat might be a Methodist. That latter report was kindly made by a Twitter colleague at my behest, to deliberately test the lunacy of this system. When he was asked why he thought my comment so hateful, he replied that I meant to imply Methodists were wandering pests that defecate in people’s gardens. South Yorkshire, with a straight face, duly recorded.
I was and remain entirely unclear about the purposes to which this ‘intelligence’ will be put. Am I to be under surveillance if I travel to South Yorkshire? Will Methodist chapels be put on high alert that I have entered the area? Just what crimes do the police think I am likely to ‘escalate’ now into committing? No one has ever told me.
The full piece is here:
https://thecritic.co.uk/the-british-twitter-stasi/
Possibly because of the publicity around the Allison Pearson case, the Police have now informed Maya Forstater that they will not be proceeding with a case against her ( a decision , it transpires, that the Crown Prosecution Service made two months ago!!).
Charles Hymas in The Telegraph ( Police drop ‘terrifying’ hate crime investigation into Maya Forstater 15 November) reports:
Police have dropped a “terrifying” investigation into a gender critical activist over a tweet she posted.
Maya Forstater, the executive director of Sex Matters, which campaigns for clarity about sex in law and policy, was told on Thursday evening that police would be taking no further action over the post on X, formerly Twitter.
Ms Forstater was investigated for 15 months by Scotland Yard after a complaint that her June 2023 post about a transgender GP was allegedly a malicious communication.
She claimed the Metropolitan Police appeared to have “sat” for two months on the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decision that there was no crime committed before informing her on Thursday evening, just a day after The Telegraph published a story about her plight.
She had told this newspaper that her experience had been “Kafkaesque” in that, like Telegraph journalist Allison Pearson, she had not been told anything about what tweet she was being investigated for or who had made the complaint until she agreed to turn up to a voluntary interview with officers.
Pearson, an award-winning writer, is being investigated by Essex Police for allegedly stirring up racial hatred in a post on X last November.
In a press statement, the Met Police said: “An allegation of malicious communication, relating to a post on social media, was reported to police in June 2023.
“A number of enquiries were carried out by officers, including liaison with the Crown Prosecution Service. We can confirm our investigation has concluded, with no further action to be taken.”
Met ‘sat’ on CPS decision for two months
Ms Forstater posted the statement on X, which said: “15 months after calling me in for questioning about a tweet, and having sat on the CPS decision that there was no crime for 2 months, the Met bothered to call me up at 7pm this evening to tell me, and then put out this press statement.”
Police contacted her two months after the post on X in June 2023 to say she was being invited to a voluntary interview to give her side of the events.
Despite asking a series of questions about the details of the allegation, she was told only that it related to a post “targeted” at a member of the transgender community. The officer said they could not divulge any more because the “victim” was susceptible to further comments.
She was warned that if she failed to attend the police interview voluntarily, she would be marked as “wanted” on the Met Police’s system for which she would eventually be arrested.
Ms Forstater subsequently attended the interview with her lawyer where she discovered it related to a transgender GP who she had claimed “enjoys intimately examining female patients without their consent”.
She claimed she was asked whether she intended to target a member of the transgender community, whether she understood that it could be perceived as transphobic and whether she had any evidence to support her claims.
‘No right not to be offended in democratic society’
Ms Forstater said she did have evidence, and defended her right to speak freely. “When I express my views publicly, I do not do so with the intention of causing distress or anxiety to those who disagree with me,” she said.
“I express my views because they are important to me, and I consider them to be a legitimate contribution to an ongoing political debate.”
The full article is here:
Sex Matters
Two reports from Sex Matters’ latest newsletter Memo ( 15 November). The first one is a real FFS report!!!!!
Parents asked for toddlers’ gender identity
A recent change to primary-school admissions forms has sparked backlash as parents of children as young as three are now being asked to specify their child’s “gender identity” alongside their sex.
The software, used by over 100 local authorities in the UK, offers options for “man/boy/male”, “woman/girl/female”, or “prefer to self-describe”.
Martin Tett, the leader of Buckinghamshire Council, admitted that it was “totally inappropriate to ask this question” and said he has asked for it to be removed as “swiftly as possible”.
Case against council
A former Bracknell Forest Borough Council employee is bringing an employment tribunal case against the council, alleging discrimination and harassment based on her gender-critical beliefs.
Sarah Holman says the council’s Trans and non-binary policy, which removed single-sex toilets, disregards privacy and safety concerns, impacting women in the workplace. Offering her own personal experience, Holman explains on her Crowdfunder that she has been sexually assaulted in a toilet and that she also suffered a miscarriage in one.
Concerns over privacy and safety were dismissed after mixed-sex lavatories were implemented, leading Holman to work primarily from home to avoid discomfort. The council suggested that those who felt uncomfortable with their trans-inclusive policy ought to be signposted to counselling services.
Holman’s complaint also targets the council’s prominent display of the Progress Pride flag, which she argues promotes a contested ideology and creates a pressured environment for gender-critical staff.
Represented by Sex Matters chair Naomi Cunningham of Outer Temple Chambers and Elizabeth McGlone of Didlaw, Holman hopes her case will help to get “political campaigning out of the public sector, and re-focus the public sector on the Nolan Principles of accountability, honesty, impartiality, objectivity, selflessness, openness, and leadership”.
Football Governance Bill
Baroness Claire Fox on the Academy of Ideas site explains the severe concerns about this new Bill.
Football Governance Bill: kick it out
Nov 15, 2024
This week the House of Lords had a Second Reading debate on the Football Governance Bill. It’s an unlikely topic for me to speak out on, except that as always, the beautiful game is being used as a political football to virtue signal, and yet another area of life the state seems to want to colonise.
Football plays a role in our national life unlike any other sport and many fans have long been angered by the way their clubs have been managed. If the Bill confined itself narrowly to financial sustainability, it might make sense. Although arguably – as the Bill gives unprecedented powers to a new Independent Football Regulator to preside over wealth redistribution - it could damage financially thriving clubs. But it goes way beyond propping up struggling clubs, with Labour adding additions to the Bill suggesting that the independent regulator will exhibit all the age-old tendencies of bureaucracy to grow arms and legs, stifling what is good about the game rather than supporting fans. Indeed, for all the rhetoric about this legislation being fan-led, I am sceptical. After all, politicians have spent recent years demonising the wrong kind of fans, and encouraging behaviour codes aimed at sanitising the terraces.
Lord Goodman has produced a very useful thread on X/Twitter explaining many of the issues and controversies, including arguments about the way money is spread through the football ‘pyramid’, the involvement of fans in decision making and the relationship with international bodies like UEFA. Lord Ranger spoke eloquently about the importance of football to supporters and communities, and how any independent regulator ‘must tread lightly’ - with comparisons to the atmosphere-killing introduction of VAR. (You can listen to the Battle of Ideas festival debate on VAR here.)
In particular, I wanted to challenge the way the new laws propose to mandate enhanced EDI measures as proof of good football clubs’ governance. But individual clubs’ own EDI policies are already causing problems for fans; forcing these on all teams, backed by a regulator with power to punish clubs that don’t comply, will undoubtedly make things worse.
In my speech, I talk about two cases that should act as warnings. Linzi Smith, who has been a die-hard Newcastle United fan for many years, found herself banned by the club for expressing her views on social media about the reality of biological sex, after a worrying and secretive investigation supported by the Premier League.
In the second case, a 17-year-old female footballer with suspected autism was banned for six matches for asking a transgender player with a beard playing in an opposing WOMEN’S TEAM: ‘Are you a man?’ This is despite the girl insisting she didn’t mean any offence by the question. Lord Triesman, the former chair of the Football Association, spoke powerfully about the case in the same debate. Both these cases suggest that adding another layer of officialdom in the current circumstances will make things even worse.
You can watch the video of the speech below or via YouTube.
The full piece is here:
Women’s Pool
Chris Pollard in The Mail Online ( Female pool players hire experts to prove transgender players have unfair advantage in landmark legal case 15 November) reports:
Female pool players have hired experts to prove biological males have an unfair advantage — after a transgender player won four out of five major ladies' titles.
The women are suing pool's governing body for sex discrimination, saying male-born players are dominating their sport and depriving them of opportunities.
Now, they have appointed a biologist and a cue expert to assess the advantages of a male-born physique at a pool table, such as increased strength, narrower hips, lack of breasts and better fast-twitch muscles.
One trans-woman, Harriet Haynes, currently holds the Champion of Champions, World Masters, European Championship and UK National Singles titles in the ladies category.
It's believed transgender players have also scooped almost half the prize money in women's pool competitions over the last year.
Professional player Lynne Pinches, who forfeited a major final because she was scheduled to play a trans-woman, said: 'Everyone knows they have an advantage, now we just need to prove it in court.
'I got these heartbreaking messages from a young girl of 18 who plays pool and snooker. She said every time she goes against a trans player, she feels like she's lost before the match has even started.
'It's not about the money, it's about the principle. If there's any compensation it will go to charity. We are trying to save this sport for women.'
Well done to Lynne and the others taking this claim.
The full article is here:
Breast Binding
Thanks to Feminist Legal Clinic for the next two pieces.
School criticised over chest binder coffee morning fundraiser for transgender pupils ( 15 November)
Staff at Bannerman High School were invited via email to the campus event and were told the £2.50 entry fee would be put towards the tight-fitting compression tops.
Chest binders are used to flatten and hide breasts. Some people can experience negative side effects, including back and chest pains, breathing difficulties, and fractured ribs.
Campaign group For Women Scotland branded it a “dangerous practice” and said it “beggars belief that the school would raise money to pay for these incredibly damaging devices”.
Calling for the school to undertake an “urgent review of policy and safeguarding”, a spokesperson for the group added: “It is as dangerous as breast ironing which, rightly, is illegal in the UK.”
It is understood the idea to raise money for the binders at the planned event next week was conceived by senior pupils on the school equalities group.
The email was said to have been sent from a staff member, with one teacher telling the Daily Record no consultation had been carried out.
The teacher told the newspaper: “Staff would be paying money to raise funds to buy breast binders for young girls and we have no idea if parents are in agreement with this.”
Source: School criticised over chest binder coffee morning fundraiser for transgender pupils
La Leche Doubles Down
I have recently featured this breastfeeding support charity who include services for larping men who want to breast feed ( small point- you can’t, you’re men!). After quite a bit of publicity arising from one of the founders of La Leche resigning, amazingly they are doubling down! As EDI Jester says, ‘get in the bin!’
Statement from LLLGB Council of Directors 14th November 2024 – La Leche League GB (16 November)
Following the resignation of Marian Tompson, one of LLL’s Founders, and Miriam Main, one of our dedicated GB Trustees, La Leche League Great Britain (LLLGB) understands there may be concerns around the support we are able to offer.
LLL International as an organisation has moved towards a policy that includes supporting transwomen (biological males) to lactate and feed their child. This is an ongoing discussion that is taking place within LLLGB as well, and our volunteers have a variety of strong views.
At present in LLLGB we are clear that our charitable objects do not currently include transwomen as beneficiaries, since “mother” is well-defined in law. The Council of Directors is made up of volunteer trustees. The current Council (by majority) is not in favour of any changes to our charitable objects or beneficiaries and is also clear that should any changes be made in the future, they must be done in such a way that is not to the detriment of the current beneficiaries.
Source: Statement from LLLGB Council of Directors 14th November 2024 – La Leche League GB
More Indoctrination
Transgender Trend report on the alarming #BeeWellsurvey.
Pupil wellbeing or gender identity indoctrination? The #BeeWell survey (14 November)
What is #BeeWell?
The #BeeWell survey began in 2021, co-founded by the University of Manchester, the Gregson Family Foundation and the mental health charity, Anna Freud. An early partner in devising the survey questions was the LGBT+ charity, The Proud Trust. Other unnamed LGBT organisations are also listed as helping so the language and concepts of transgender activism, (cisgender, sex-assigned at birth) are baked into the project design. It’s now 3 years into its 10-year plan and boasts a growing list of partners and funders, 140 at the last count.
They continue:
What do the #BeeWell findings reveal?
All three #BeeWell survey reports so far have headlined gender identity and sexual orientation as the biggest inequalities in terms of wellbeing, higher in fact than income inequality as measured by free school meals, ethnicity, or special educational needs status.
“Overall, life Satisfaction and mental wellbeing scores of young people surveyed are in line with expected scores based on comparable studies. However, there are persistent inequalities in wellbeing scores, particularly across gender and sexual orientation.
Gay and lesbian young people reported experiencing the lowest wellbeing and reported that they are least satisfied with their lives, followed closely by bisexual and pansexual young people, and those who identify as transgender and gender-diverse.”
The above from the summary of the 2023 findings echoes the two previous years. Gay teenagers and those expressing some sort of gender related distress (transgender and gender-diverse according to #BeeWell) are faring worse than other children.
These figures while giving cause for concern are not surprising. It’s difficult being a gay teenager and those presenting as the opposite sex do get picked on, bullied. Life is harder for them. But is the data collection method itself part of the problem?
There is more detail here about the 2021 #BeeWell survey. 37,978 children from 165 schools took part. 7.08% said they were transgender. This means 2,688 children claiming to be trans, equating to roughly 16 trans identifying children on average in every one of the schools who took part in the survey. This is just not credible.
The ONS census of 2021 showed that of 262,000 people over the age of 16, 0.05% of the population identified as transgender. And this statistic is now known to be unreliable due to confusion over the wording of the question on ‘gender identity.’
Curious researchers ought to have asked why 7.08% of schoolchildren in the Greater Manchester area believe they are trans.
The figures for the differentiation in wellbeing for girls and boys are equally suspect. #BeeWell used local authority records for the sexes for the total number of children taking part in 2021. These came from the information given when a child starts schools, based on their birth certificate. As no child can get a Gender Recognition Certificate they are reliable and show a rough 50/50 split in the sex ratio. Despite this #BeeWell bases its findings on this breakdown of the sex category: 40.03% female and 41.71 male.
Where have the remaining 18.26% gone? Are they boys or girls? Some ticked the non-binary box, some preferred not to say. But the category female itself is not robust as it includes ‘trans-girls’; that is, boys who identify as girls. And what percentage of the girls have been counted as boys in the male category?
Clearly it will not be the first time that the #BeeWell cohort have come across the concepts of gender identity and being transgender. Every part of popular culture and social media is suffused with the idea that identity is a pick and mix option, unmoored from the body. These cultural forces constantly tell children they are at risk of harm from a wider transphobic society.
But rather than holding children in reality, #BellWell lends authority to gender ideology. Children cannot fill in this survey unless they go along with the idea of gender identity. The questionnaire tells them that this is the truth, a boy can be a girl. There is nowhere for children to be truthful about sex and many of the 13-15 year-olds won’t even notice that the assumption is being made. This is invisible indoctrination.
The full piece is here:
https://www.transgendertrend.com/beewell-pupil-wellbeing-gender-identity-indoctrination/
What Is Our Goal?
Over to Kellie-Jay and EDI Jester 😊
Endpiece by Liz
More from Fascinating Aida 😊
#BeMorePorcupine
#LetWomenSpeak
#Grassroots Army
#GenderIdeologyIsEvil
An excellent roundup, Dusty. So much to take in; not so much ‘We are Forever Young’, more like Maurice Chevalier’s’ I’m Glad I’m not Young Anymore’. Thanks; will share.
I think what this update illustrates is just how deeply and subtly embedded the ideology is everywhere…. school admission forms FFS and the Transgender Trend piece. It’s going to take years to unravel it all and the ideologues and fetishists will fight it all the way. Sorry Dusty, you’re stuck with it for the long haul. 😁 And thanks as ever.